Court: High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Category: Civil
Judge(s): Hon. John M. Mativo
Judgment Date: August 05, 2020
Country: Kenya
Document Type: PDF
Number of Pages: 4
Explore the key insights from the Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & another; Premier Verification Quality Services (PVQS) Limited case summary, highlighting pivotal legal principles and implications in public procurement.Case Brief: Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & another; Premier Verification Quality Services (PVQS) Limited (Interested Party) Ex Parte Tuv Austria Turk [2020] eKLR 1. Case Information:- Name of the Case: Republic v. Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 Others- Case Number: Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 60 of 2020- Court: High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Judicial Review Division- Date Delivered: August 5, 2020- Category of Law: Civil- Judge(s): Hon. John M. Mativo- Country: Kenya 2. Questions Presented:The central legal issues the court had to resolve included:1. Whether the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board (the Board) acted ultra vires by failing to provide the applicant, TUV Austria Turk, with a fair hearing during the review process.2. Whether the Board’s decision to uphold the Procuring Entity’s rejection of TUV Austria Turk's tender was lawful, given the alleged failure to notify the applicant of all addenda and the requirement for tender security..................
Below is the summary preview.
This is the end of the summary preview.
Share this with your network: